Ronn said: >> At most, this will show that the US Constitution doesn't protect >> freedom of speech. > > What do you mean?
I mean that a freedom isn't a freedom if it's constrained, so that if constitutional scholars consider such a constrained freedom "freedom of speech" then they are using that phrase in a technical sense and not the "everyday" sense of the words (leaving aside the difficulty that perhaps people use the phrase in the legal-scholarese way in everyday life!). Rich _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
