Really, Doug, all this Monday morning quarterbacking is going nowhere. Next you'll be complaining because Tom Clancy warned us about crashing a plane
into the capitol building.
Spin every little thing you can all day long, but everybody knows the truth:> nobody took these jackasses as seriously as we wish we had before 9-11.
But the evidence points to the fact that Clinton/Gore took them _more_ seriously than Bush did. The evidence shows that Bush deemphisized counter-terrorism leading up to 9/11 and Bush's own words - that he didn't feel a sense of urgency concerning terrorism - are proof of the neglegence exhibited by his administration. Do you care to refute the evidence or do you think your empty rhetoric will convince us to ignore the facts?
I'm just glad Bush was there instead of Gore when the wake-up call came.
I'm convinced by the evidence that 9/11 is less likely to have happened under Gore. What exactly is it that convinces you otherwise?
-- Doug GSV Saudi Lap Dogs? _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
