On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 06:00:10PM +0000, Richard Baker wrote: > and chimpanzee genes. At one end, there's one that's 99% human and > 1% chimpanzee. At the other end, there's one that's 1% human and > 99% chimp. Between these extremes they vary in 1% increments. Now, > which of these (if any) do you consider should be worthy of the same > protection that fully human foetuses should be accorded?
I can see the soul now! Soul: [Looks at zygote with 1% chimp] "Oooooh, yuck, I'm not going in there!" -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
