On 2 Sep 2006 at 20:04, David Hobby wrote: > Andrew Crystall wrote: > ... > > You won't actually get many Rabbis willing to hold forth on pure > ... > > That's why I brought up many-words/multiverse - in that, we are not > > unique snowflakes at all. There are at "alpha" versions of you, for > > example, if they're true. I'm not going to get into transinfinites, > > but if it's true then we're NOT unique, NOT unusual. > ... > > Andrew-- > > Going with this whole Jewish thing, I'm thinking you may > mean "aleph". : ) > > As in: "There are at least aleph-null versions of you, for > example, if that's true." On do I have any idea what you > were trying to say?
Bleck, yes, aleph. Heh. As a further note, it's also somewhat explored in Ian Macleod's _Learning the World_, but I consider it quite clumsy in comparison. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
