Thanks Dan,

I guess I missed that message in the bustle of my life.

As another after word, every single one of my Archt schoolmates contacted in no way buys the official story. Every one of them cited the pile-up of those vertical support beams should have tipped the building, any building, off to one side or another. None could think of examples of a zero footprint implosion w/o demolition. Confusion over the complete sell-off of all material that could be studied was a mystery that baffles many - as well as no regulatory body issuing upgraded reqs in light of an unprecedented tripple-whammy systemic failure occurring the same day. All believe WTC 7 is the lynchpin that can reveal what/who benefits from this canard.

Thought you'd like to know.

I'd like to know more about this grad-school gal who thinks she knows more than practicing architects about what should and shouldn't be able to stand.

- Jonathan -


On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Dan Minette wrote:



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Land
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 1:05 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: What should we believe when there is no reliable information?

On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:

BTW - Is it impertinent to ask whatever happened to our WTC
questions now?

Someone, I'm not sure who, but I think it may have been Dan Minette,
wrote to the list that Gautam's friend on the 9/11 commission was
disinclined to answer further questions at this time.


I was the one, indeed, who wrote that. To clarify, though, Gautam's friend was a staffer for the 9/11 commission, not a member of the commission. She
is now a fellow grad. student at MIT.

As I said, she is a liberal Democrat at a school where even the most
conservative people tend to think poorly of the Bush.  However, she has
become rather vexed with the conspiracy theories that have proliferated. I think she used some four letter words in response to the poll that stated that somewhere about 30% to 35% of Americans believed that the US government
was somehow involved in 9-11....besides questioning the poll's
methodology....she was rather upset that very many people at all could
subscribe to crackpot theories.

So, that possible avenue is now closed...sorry.

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Jonathan Gibson
www.formandfunction.com/word
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to