On 8 Jul 2009 at 23:43, Doug Pensinger wrote: > Charlie Wrote > > ...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's gOS which > > Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces and BSDs to > > try, up to and including Darwin/OSX. So I'm with Will (you can pick > > yourselves up at your leisure). Don't see the point of Chrome, except to > > leverage Google's brand and no doubt increase the amount of data they have > > to analyse on the way we use PCs... > > > > To (eventually) give PC users a _real_ alternative to Windows? If Google > can't do it no one can. And who doesn't want an alternative to PoS windows? > Do we think that Microsoft and Apple aren't scrutinizing their data? > Personally, I think Google has made the net a better place. The Spam > filter on Gmail is a thing of beauty; very close to infallible in this > particular data point. I love Picassa, and Google News is my favorite way > to find news from a wide variety of sources.
The spam filter on Pegaus Mail works fine for me, and it's mine rather then being in the control of a company which is going to scan my emails. I've yet to find (and this includes gmail) another filter which is more than 90% accurate for me. And yes, I know Microsoft aren't looking at my data. Regardless of the OS, I'll require a program from a third party sitting across the net connection monitoring, logging and asking for permission as appropriate for me, and a router logging network connections as well. AndrewC _______________________________________________ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
