On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensinger<brig...@zo.com> wrote:
> I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better. That is a particularly uninformative statistic. Much more interesting would be two figures: probability of false positives ( number of real marked as spam / number of real), and probability of false negatives (number spam passed as real / number of spam). _______________________________________________ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
