----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 12:06 AM Subject: Re: Brin: the new Bush ad : I don't see any morphing...
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:48:12 -0500, Dan Minette > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Michael Moore, on his website: > > > > I'm sorry, but the majority of Americans supported > > > > this war once it began and, sadly, that majority must > > > > now sacrifice their children until enough blood has > > > > been let that maybe -- just maybe -- God and the Iraqi > > > > people will forgive us in the end. > > > > If that were the case, then why bring up the requirement of blood atonement > > being required as a prerequisite for even the possibility of obtaining > > God's forgiveness? That reminds me of Pat Robertson, to put it nicely. > > > > As critics and supporters admit, Michael Moore seems to easily lapse > into overblown rhetoric, I have never seen him mention or have anyone > else attribute to him any beliefs related to blood atonement. OK, parse the phrase " sadly, that majority must now sacrifice their children until enough blood has been let that maybe -- just maybe -- God and the Iraqi people will forgive us in the end." Does the invoking of the need for God's forgiveness really not refer to sin? Didn't he said that enough blood must be spilled for said forgiveness to take place? Now, if you are argueing that he actually said this with his overblown reteroric but really doesn't believe in some sort of blood karma when asked for details; I could buy that. But, he is just as responsible for what he says as Pat and Rush and Trent are. Particularly, when he puts in in a website; where he has time to reflect and review before it goes in there. Its not as though its a misquote in the Washington Times? Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
