Hi Laurent ! > Getting *everything* into Busybox - one binary to rule them all - >smells a bit too much like systemd. Do we want to go there ?
1) I like to create small self contained initramfs systems. Systems included in a single kernel image. So all you need to run the system is that single kernel image and a boot loader to start. In those initramfs systems i like to have only a minimum of statically linked binaries with a maximum of flexibility. At best there is only one binary containing all the utilities and the special application binaries. 2) Comparing a utility collection box like Busybox with a tool like systemd really smells bad. They are two completely different things. -- Harald _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
