Just Google ‘field strength measurements using drones” to see the SOTA and what 
the prominent RF developers ans service consultants are doing.   They’ve been 
doing it for awhile.
RH

Sent from my i-Thingamajig

> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
> 
> Considering you can buy a small drone with a camera for less than $100, an 
> amateur FSD could cost less than $200. 
> https://bunnytags.com/products/mini-hd-camera-drone-pocket-quadcopter-remote-controlled-for-kids?utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=Google%20Shopping&currency=USD&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIoamGyYCm7wIVUb7ACh1nAA5OEAQYCyABEgIkAvD_BwE
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Gary Sitton via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Super great idea!
>> Gary, K5AMH 
>> 
>> 
>>> On March 10, 2021 12:22:18 AM Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, what is an FSD? It is a Field Strength Drone. It’s an idea I am sure 
>>> others have had, and I don’t expect to get around to designing or patenting 
>>> such a thing. But inventions are often just the merging of new 
>>> technologies, and this is not much different. I don’t see any YouTubes 
>>> about this or any other reference, so here’s the idea:
>>> 
>>> With all the capabilities of little drones I wonder if anyone has designed 
>>> one which can carry a field strength meter and fly a grid around an antenna 
>>> to evaluate antenna performance. The guts of my little Radio Shack FSM 
>>> would have weighed way less than an ounce.
>>> 
>>> Ideally, the field strength meter could communicate to the base through the 
>>> drone transmitter, reducing weight. Software at the base could link the 
>>> drone 3D location data with the FS reading. The drone would have to wait at 
>>> test locations for the operator to transmit, and ideally would move to the 
>>> next location. Finally, the software might be able to link with existing 
>>> simulation software for comparison with theory and allow for simulation 
>>> model improvement. This looks like it would take a small team to develop.
>>> 
>>> This sounds like it would have many uses besides antenna evaluation, like 
>>> RFI evaluation.
>>> 
>>> What about it? Has anyone done this?
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> N5PRD
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>> 
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________________
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
> ________________________________________________
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here: 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to