Agreed. That appears to be part of the approach in the commercial version, 
which looks to extend about 18” down. 

Mark 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 10, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Nizar Mullani <mull...@tlite.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> The easiest, and cheapest solution is to hang a self contained FSM a few feet 
> down the Drone.to get away from the PWM noise. Otherwise, you will have to 
> filter the noise in the FSM.
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:06 AM Mark Brantana <n5...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Ok. So researching the available drones and addressing noise is job one. No 
>> doubt the smaller the drone, the noisier. Likewise, the cheaper ones will 
>> probably have more noise. I was hoping since everything is DC, noise might 
>> not be an issue. But clearly it is a key consideration. Thanks Nizar. Are 
>> there fixes?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:53 AM, Gary Sitton <gasit...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nizar is right, those drone motors are 3 phase permanent magnet, brushless 
>>> DC motors with PWM controllers which are very noisy. This would require 
>>> sophisticated noise canceling software as well as hardware mitigation. 
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On March 10, 2021 9:21:33 AM Nizar Mullani <mull...@tlite.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Make sure the Drone electronics is quiet enough to not interfere with the 
>>>> Field Strength Measurements. 
>>>> Nizar K0NM
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Considering you can buy a small drone with a camera for less than $100, 
>>>>> an amateur FSD could cost less than $200. 
>>>>> https://bunnytags.com/products/mini-hd-camera-drone-pocket-quadcopter-remote-controlled-for-kids?utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=Google%20Shopping&currency=USD&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIoamGyYCm7wIVUb7ACh1nAA5OEAQYCyABEgIkAvD_BwE
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Gary Sitton via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Super great idea!
>>>>>> Gary, K5AMH 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On March 10, 2021 12:22:18 AM Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> OK, what is an FSD? It is a Field Strength Drone. It’s an idea I am 
>>>>>>> sure others have had, and I don’t expect to get around to designing or 
>>>>>>> patenting such a thing. But inventions are often just the merging of 
>>>>>>> new technologies, and this is not much different. I don’t see any 
>>>>>>> YouTubes about this or any other reference, so here’s the idea:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> With all the capabilities of little drones I wonder if anyone has 
>>>>>>> designed one which can carry a field strength meter and fly a grid 
>>>>>>> around an antenna to evaluate antenna performance. The guts of my 
>>>>>>> little Radio Shack FSM would have weighed way less than an ounce.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ideally, the field strength meter could communicate to the base through 
>>>>>>> the drone transmitter, reducing weight. Software at the base could link 
>>>>>>> the drone 3D location data with the FS reading. The drone would have to 
>>>>>>> wait at test locations for the operator to transmit, and ideally would 
>>>>>>> move to the next location. Finally, the software might be able to link 
>>>>>>> with existing simulation software for comparison with theory and allow 
>>>>>>> for simulation model improvement. This looks like it would take a small 
>>>>>>> team to develop.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This sounds like it would have many uses besides antenna evaluation, 
>>>>>>> like RFI evaluation.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What about it? Has anyone done this?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>> N5PRD
>>>>>>> ________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>>>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>>>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>>>>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ________________________________________________
>>>>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>>>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
>>>>> ________________________________________________
>>>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>>>> 
>>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
>>> 
>>> 
> ________________________________________________
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here: 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to