Make sure the Drone electronics is quiet enough to not interfere with the Field 
Strength Measurements. 
Nizar K0NM

> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
> 
> Considering you can buy a small drone with a camera for less than $100, an 
> amateur FSD could cost less than $200. 
> https://bunnytags.com/products/mini-hd-camera-drone-pocket-quadcopter-remote-controlled-for-kids?utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=Google%20Shopping&currency=USD&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIoamGyYCm7wIVUb7ACh1nAA5OEAQYCyABEgIkAvD_BwE
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>>> On Mar 10, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Gary Sitton via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> Super great idea!
>> Gary, K5AMH 
>> 
>> 
>>> On March 10, 2021 12:22:18 AM Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, what is an FSD? It is a Field Strength Drone. It’s an idea I am sure 
>>> others have had, and I don’t expect to get around to designing or patenting 
>>> such a thing. But inventions are often just the merging of new 
>>> technologies, and this is not much different. I don’t see any YouTubes 
>>> about this or any other reference, so here’s the idea:
>>> 
>>> With all the capabilities of little drones I wonder if anyone has designed 
>>> one which can carry a field strength meter and fly a grid around an antenna 
>>> to evaluate antenna performance. The guts of my little Radio Shack FSM 
>>> would have weighed way less than an ounce.
>>> 
>>> Ideally, the field strength meter could communicate to the base through the 
>>> drone transmitter, reducing weight. Software at the base could link the 
>>> drone 3D location data with the FS reading. The drone would have to wait at 
>>> test locations for the operator to transmit, and ideally would move to the 
>>> next location. Finally, the software might be able to link with existing 
>>> simulation software for comparison with theory and allow for simulation 
>>> model improvement. This looks like it would take a small team to develop.
>>> 
>>> This sounds like it would have many uses besides antenna evaluation, like 
>>> RFI evaluation.
>>> 
>>> What about it? Has anyone done this?
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> N5PRD
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>> 
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________________
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
> ________________________________________________
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here: 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to