On Aug 23, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Dave Everitt wrote: > For me, the philosophy is to keep it as simple as absolutely possible. > > I'm an eternal newbie, really keen to maintain a way for 'the rest of us' to > have a web framework that: > > 1. doesn't give you cognitive overload and file bloat, > 2. encourages experimentation with a low entry threshold, > 3. can also handle serious web development, > 4. doesn't take itself too seriously.
Yes, yes, yes. The edge-of-zany feel really reinforces most of this. > > As for the distinction between Camping and others frameworks, I reckon It's > enough to say that Camping is the original/archetypal micro-framework (is it? > IOWA?), and the community makes sure it stays true to its original approach. > It is. IOWA is most definitely more something else. > The missing part in the tutorial for me is deployment. I have yet to deploy > anything public! But that's anther post. Indeed. And like all things Ruby, deployment can be twiddly. _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
