"Mr. Raymond Tylicki"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The move to counter that would be to run tanks on the bottom of the the
>drained canals. and have a crack team of Army Corp of Engineers to buuld
>tempory dams...
> Also 50% of the PRESENT day Erie Canal is on canalised rivers....Your move
> Nigel..
It isn't dams that would be the problem, it's locks. And you are
unlikely to repair a sabotaged lock in an afternoon.
But I'm also confused by the logic here. If the tanks are on the
canal bottom, and the Engineers build a dam, won't the tanks then be
under water?
Adrian
Adrian Stott
07956-299966
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
