----- Original Message ----- From: "roger_millin" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:14 PM Subject: [canals-list] Re: Hudson weed hatches
> Now, let's just look at the credibility of the two witnesses. > > One is a qualified engineer, member of engineering professional bodies, > spent all his working life involved with vehicles, ran his own specialised > garage business, specialised in emissions and on-board diagnostics, worked > for a brief period for Lister at Dursley (it was a very brief aberration), > worked for several major car manufacturers and can rebuild and marinise > his own engines. > > The other is a camera shop proprietor who has to get said engineer to > adjust his slow idle correctly after said camera shop man had buggered up > the settings. > > On balance, who would a sensible court believe when assessing the > performance/emissions of engines generally and Gardners in particular (Oh, > and Listers....spit)? > ;-)))) > Roger Is this a trick question? I would believe the one who was paying for the beer ................. Phil
