Phil Rushton wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "roger_millin" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:14 PM > Subject: [canals-list] Re: Hudson weed hatches > > >> Now, let's just look at the credibility of the two witnesses. >> >> One is a qualified engineer, member of engineering professional bodies, >> spent all his working life involved with vehicles, ran his own specialised >> garage business, specialised in emissions and on-board diagnostics, worked >> for a brief period for Lister at Dursley (it was a very brief aberration), >> worked for several major car manufacturers and can rebuild and marinise >> his own engines. >> >> The other is a camera shop proprietor who has to get said engineer to >> adjust his slow idle correctly after said camera shop man had buggered up >> the settings. >> >> On balance, who would a sensible court believe when assessing the >> performance/emissions of engines generally and Gardners in particular (Oh, >> and Listers....spit)? >> ;-)))) >> Roger > > Is this a trick question? > > I would believe the one who was paying for the beer ................. > > Phil > > > > ------------------------------------ >
Will not be bus stop Mac then :-) -- Michael Clarke
