On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Hans Dieter Pearcey < hdp.perl.catalyst.us...@weftsoar.net> wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, you missed the point of my message, which makes me > wonder > if I've missed the point of yours. Are you talking about a set of > conventions > you'd like to be able to build for your own use on top of HTTP::Body, or a > set > of conventions that you expect everyone will want and so should be built > into > HTTP::Body, or something else entirely? > I thought you were saying that the request might not be a normal form posting, and I was saying only that HTTP::Body can support that, too. I was not suggesting everyone should use one method over another. HTTP::Body seems (to me) like the natural place to deserialize. Yet, the REST modules I cited use an action class to deserialize. Thus, I was wondering if there was a specific reasons for that approach that I had not understood. That's really all. -- Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
