Hello,

FRTS is not required for the multilink PPP interface. As long as you have the 
virtual-template correctly configured that error will pop up but it doesn't 
matter as the interface will be up/up anyway. Now don't ask me how I know 
this!!! 



> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:05:39 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] multink ppp over frame relay - is FRTS   
> mandatory?
> 
> MLPPPoFR is a royal pain to find... Good stuff to know though! QoS config
> guide - http://grab.by/8u9e
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_over_fr_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Bojan Zivancevic <[email protected]
> > wrote:
> 
> > One more dilemma on my side...
> >
> > When I try to enable multilink ppp over FR (virtual-templates blablabla) I
> > always get the message
> >
> > %FR-3-MLPOFR_ERROR: MLPoFR not configured properly on Link Virtual-Access1
> > Bundle Virtual-Access3 :
> > Frame Relay traffic shaping must be enabled
> >
> > I know I have read somewhere that this message should be ignored and that
> > in fact MLPPP works without it over FR. But now I can't find it.
> >
> > And I did not find a sure way to check if it is working or not. Can
> > somebody confirm FRTS must be applied or not, and it would be great if
> > someone could explain how to verify if MLPPP is really working (with or
> > without FRTS.)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Bojan Zivancevic
> > Network Engineer
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
                                          
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to