Guys, Only but ONLY enable FRTS on a lab exam question if inside your map-class you are defining the CIR value of the link bw, otherwise it will set it to default (64k) and you will miss the point if the circuit bw is different than 64k, I would really be cautious about it.
Please be careful when taking that approach, it can def. blew up any objective you are trying to achieve. Rgs, Jeferson 2011/1/20 Jay Taylor <[email protected]> > Very interested to hear as well. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Bojan Zivancevic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Tyson, I would like to know more about your statement. Cisco explicitely > asks us to use FRTS, and I did not find any other explanation why not to. > > > > Why do you think it will cause trouble? Maybe we would lose connectivity? > If that is the case we would surely see at once that the link is broken. > > > > Any other thoughts behind your opinion? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Bojan Zivancevic > > Network Engineer > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tyson Scott [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 18:38 > > To: Bojan Zivancevic; 'Jay Taylor' > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] multink ppp over frame relay - is FRTS > mandatory? > > > > I would be cautious to take that approach > > > > Regards, > > > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. > Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Mailto: [email protected] > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 > > Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat > > eFax: +1.810.454.0130 > > > > IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, > Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco > CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with > training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and > Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at > www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bojan > Zivancevic > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 7:49 AM > > To: Jay Taylor > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] multink ppp over frame relay - is FRTS > mandatory? > > > > "I do know that should I encounter MLPPPoFR on my next lab attempt I'll > be enabling FRTS regardless!" > > > > I'll subscribe to that. :) > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Bojan Zivancevic > > Network Engineer > > ---- > > > > From: Jay Taylor [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 16:00 > > To: Bojan Zivancevic > > Cc: Nicolas MICHEL; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] multink ppp over frame relay - is FRTS > mandatory? > > > > I do know that should I encounter MLPPPoFR on my next lab attempt I'll be > enabling FRTS regardless! > > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Bojan Zivancevic < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Yeah, connectivity works, that's for sure. That is why I asked the > question in the first place - you just can't be sure what FRTS brings. > > > > But you have a point, since LFI is a part of QoS, guess in order for it > to work in this situation you need FRTS - for some reason behind the scene. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Bojan Zivancevic > > Network Engineer > > ---- > > > > From: Jay Taylor [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 15:43 > > To: Bojan Zivancevic > > Cc: Nicolas MICHEL; > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] multink ppp over frame relay - is FRTS > mandatory? > > > > I agree though... basic connectivity works without FTRS enabled. I would > imagine that fragmenting and interleaving would not though. > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Bojan Zivancevic < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Maybe exactly the fact it is in the QoS section means that FRTS has to be > enabled. :) > > > > And btw it is mentioned in the document, but not explained why. Bah. > Cisco doc often sucks on my opinion. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Bojan Zivancevic > > Network Engineer > > ---- > > Comutel d.o.o. > > Omladinskih brigada 65v > > 11070 Belgrade > > SERBIA > > > > Tel: +381 11 217 8000 Ext.109 > > Mob: +381 64 646 8401 > > Fax: +381 11 6164641 > > > > http://www.comutel.co.rs<http://www.comutel.co.rs/> > > > > From: Nicolas MICHEL > > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 15:20 > > To: Jay Taylor > > Cc: Bojan Zivancevic; > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] multink ppp over frame relay - is FRTS > mandatory? > > > > Cant beleive MLPPPoFR is on the QOS section ... I wouldnt have find it > without your help Jay ! > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > 2011/1/20 Jay Taylor <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > MLPPPoFR is a royal pain to find... Good stuff to know though! QoS config > guide - http://grab.by/8u9e > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_o > > ver_fr_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Bojan Zivancevic < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >> wrote: > > > >> One more dilemma on my side... > >> > >> When I try to enable multilink ppp over FR (virtual-templates > >> blablabla) I always get the message > >> > >> %FR-3-MLPOFR_ERROR: MLPoFR not configured properly on Link > >> Virtual-Access1 Bundle Virtual-Access3 : > >> Frame Relay traffic shaping must be enabled > >> > >> I know I have read somewhere that this message should be ignored and > >> that in fact MLPPP works without it over FR. But now I can't find it. > >> > >> And I did not find a sure way to check if it is working or not. Can > >> somebody confirm FRTS must be applied or not, and it would be great if > >> someone could explain how to verify if MLPPP is really working (with > >> or without FRTS.) > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> Bojan Zivancevic > >> Network Engineer > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> > > > > > > > > -- > > Nicolas MICHEL > > Ingenieur Réseaux et Securité (CCNA/CCNP) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
