That sounds reasonable. The Cisco docs says "choose an existing area" which kind of leaves it open.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > Ohhhh, gotcha... whatever area you'd like to make appear contiguous across > the MPLS network then. > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Correct. That wasnt my question though. >> >> What area should the sham link use? >> >> >> router ospf 1 >> area XXX sham-link 200.1.1.1 200.2.2.2 >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Actually, the loopbacks used for the sham link shouldn't be advertised >>> into OSPF. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> I think this a simple question >>>> >>>> When configuring a Sham Link how do you determine what area to choose? >>>> Does the area that you choose matter? >>>> >>>> Aaron >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Jay Taylor >>> CCIE #28391 >>> @JTIE_6EE7 >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Jay Taylor > CCIE #28391 > @JTIE_6EE7 > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
