I suspect it's not working over AREA 24 because R6 is not in area 24. Don't 
both endpoints of the sham-link need to be in the same area?

Derek Mills 
<><
Network Engineer

Desk  314-765-8891   |   Cell 636-232-7623
[email protected]   |   www.thinkapplied.com 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Moreck
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:39 PM
To: Marko Milivojevic
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sham Link Question

Here is my diagram that i am working with.  I know the example is a bit
extreem but i wanted to force as may problems in the lab as possible



 --------MPLS------------
 |                              |
 |                              |
R6 (PE)                    R2 (PE)
 |                              |
 |                              |
(AREA 56)                (AREA 24)
 |                              |
 |                              |
R5                          R4
 |                              |
 |                              |
(AREA 56)                (AREA 24)
 |                               |
 |                               |
R7                            R8
 |                               |
 |                               |
(AREA 0)                   (AREA 0)
 |                               |
 |                               |
R1                             R9
 |                               |
 |                             |
 -------(AREA 19)--------
        (Backdoor Link)

Here is what i have done
1.)  Virtual Link AREA 19 Between R1 and R9
2.)  Virtual Link AREA 56 Between R7-R5-R6
3.)  Virtual Link Area 24 Between R8-R4-R2
4.)  Sham Link Area 24 Between R2 and R6

If i put the sham link into area 0 all is good
If i put the sham link into area 24 all routes from other side show up as E2
routes
I tried making a virtual link as well in area 24 between R2 and R6 (over the
sham link)  but that did nothing (I didnt expect it to but it was worth a
shot)

Where is my logic wrong?


On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote:

> Your choice of area must be done so it doesn't break OSPF's rules of
> hierarchy in MPLS VPNs: All areas must connect to backbone area(s). If
> backbone area(s) is(are) present, they all must connect to the
> superbackbone.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: [email protected]
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 09:49, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I think this a simple question
> >
> > When configuring a Sham Link how do you determine what area to choose?
> > Does the area that you choose matter?
> >
> > Aaron
>  > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
> >
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to