I dont think that that is the case.


On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mills, Derek <[email protected]
> wrote:

> I suspect it's not working over AREA 24 because R6 is not in area 24. Don't
> both endpoints of the sham-link need to be in the same area?
>
> Derek Mills
> <><
> Network Engineer
>
> Desk  314-765-8891   |   Cell 636-232-7623
> [email protected]   |   www.thinkapplied.com
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Moreck
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:39 PM
> To: Marko Milivojevic
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sham Link Question
>
> Here is my diagram that i am working with.  I know the example is a bit
> extreem but i wanted to force as may problems in the lab as possible
>
>
>
>  --------MPLS------------
>  |                              |
>  |                              |
> R6 (PE)                    R2 (PE)
>  |                              |
>  |                              |
> (AREA 56)                (AREA 24)
>  |                              |
>  |                              |
> R5                          R4
>  |                              |
>  |                              |
> (AREA 56)                (AREA 24)
>  |                               |
>  |                               |
> R7                            R8
>  |                               |
>  |                               |
> (AREA 0)                   (AREA 0)
>  |                               |
>  |                               |
> R1                             R9
>  |                               |
>  |                             |
>  -------(AREA 19)--------
>        (Backdoor Link)
>
> Here is what i have done
> 1.)  Virtual Link AREA 19 Between R1 and R9
> 2.)  Virtual Link AREA 56 Between R7-R5-R6
> 3.)  Virtual Link Area 24 Between R8-R4-R2
> 4.)  Sham Link Area 24 Between R2 and R6
>
> If i put the sham link into area 0 all is good
> If i put the sham link into area 24 all routes from other side show up as
> E2
> routes
> I tried making a virtual link as well in area 24 between R2 and R6 (over
> the
> sham link)  but that did nothing (I didnt expect it to but it was worth a
> shot)
>
> Where is my logic wrong?
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Your choice of area must be done so it doesn't break OSPF's rules of
> > hierarchy in MPLS VPNs: All areas must connect to backbone area(s). If
> > backbone area(s) is(are) present, they all must connect to the
> > superbackbone.
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >
> > Mailto: [email protected]
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 09:49, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hello Everyone,
> > >
> > > I think this a simple question
> > >
> > > When configuring a Sham Link how do you determine what area to choose?
> > > Does the area that you choose matter?
> > >
> > > Aaron
> >  > _______________________________________________
> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> <
> http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>  > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to