For labbing purposes it seems you're always trying to make Area 0 contiguous
but I believe it should work for any area you choose.


On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote:

> That sounds reasonable.  The Cisco docs says "choose an existing area"
> which kind of leaves it open.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ohhhh, gotcha... whatever area you'd like to make appear contiguous across
>> the MPLS network then.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Correct.  That wasnt my question though.
>>>
>>> What area should the sham link use?
>>>
>>>
>>> router ospf 1
>>>  area XXX  sham-link 200.1.1.1 200.2.2.2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Actually, the loopbacks used for the sham link shouldn't be advertised
>>>> into OSPF.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hello Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this a simple question
>>>>>
>>>>> When configuring a Sham Link how do you determine what area to choose?
>>>>> Does the area that you choose matter?
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Jay Taylor
>>>> CCIE #28391
>>>> @JTIE_6EE7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jay Taylor
>> CCIE #28391
>> @JTIE_6EE7
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 

Jay Taylor
CCIE #28391
@JTIE_6EE7
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to