Hello, variance does not matter in your scenario. Only feasible successors are used for load balancing, variance only 'breaks' the equal cost load balancing, does not make your EIGRP process break the feasibility rules.
Regards. On Aug 10, 2012, at 11:05 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Sorry I didnt check well, had some variance and delay configs. > > On 10 August 2012 00:39, Keller Giacomarro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Good thought on variance, but I do not have it configured. >> >> R3(config-router)#do show ver | inc 12.4 >> Cisco IOS Software, C2600 Software (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version >> 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) >> R3(config-router)#do show run | inc variance >> R3(config-router)# >> >> I'm also pretty sure it's not an artifact from my setup, as the output >> I pasted was directly out of the solution guide! >> >> Keller Giacomarro >> [email protected] >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:35 AM, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Keller, >>> Which IOS version are you using? >>> Just tested in 12.4T, I only see feasible successor when I use the below >>> command. >>> I would guess you have variance configured under eigrp. >>> >>> /Aliou >>> >>> On 10 August 2012 00:07, Keller Giacomarro <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay, pretty stumped here. >>>> >>>> R3#show ip eigrp topology 150.1.7.0 255.255.255.0 >>>> IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 150.1.7.0/24 >>>> State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 128256 >>>> Routing Descriptor Blocks: >>>> 155.1.37.7 (FastEthernet0/0), from 155.1.37.7, Send flag is 0x0 >>>> Composite metric is (128256/128000), Route is Internal >>>> Vector metric: >>>> Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit >>>> Total delay is 5010 microseconds >>>> Reliability is 255/255 >>>> Load is 1/255 >>>> Minimum MTU is 1500 >>>> Hop count is 1 >>>> 155.1.0.5 (Serial1/0.1), from 155.1.0.5, Send flag is 0x0 >>>> Composite metric is (1152512/640512), Route is Internal >>>> Vector metric: >>>> Minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit >>>> Total delay is 45020 microseconds >>>> Reliability is 255/255 >>>> Load is 1/255 >>>> >>>> I thought that 'show ip eigrp topo x.x.x.x/x' showed successors and >>>> feasible successors only. But the second entry above shows an AD of >>>> 640512, which is larger than the FD of 128256. Is this considered a >>>> Feasible Successor or not? If not, what's it doing in this command >>>> output? >>>> >>>> Thanks as always! >>>> >>>> Keller Giacomarro >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
