Hi Brian,

Yes an explicit dial-peer states "TO 4158884343".

However even if revert back to using the 9.14158884343 Route pattern & I force 
my HQ MGCP gateway to be the first choice, I still get "TO 914158884343".  So I 
don't think it's a H323 issue more a CUCM/config one.

Also the reload of the H323, did not help.

Thank you for your suggestions, I think I'll move on & revisit later (I think 
I'd have ran out of time in the real lab by now :) ),

Regards

Stuart


From: Brian Mulgrew [mailto:btmulg...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 25 September 2011 20:52
To: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 TEHO - phone display issue

Hi Stuart-  try setting an explicit dial peer for 4158884343 (doing appropiate 
xfm in cucm) - if this works the issue could be related to the
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update command not taking.

I seem to remember having to reload the gateway on an occassion to get this to 
work.


hth
Brian

________________________________
From: stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk
To: btmulg...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:42:43 +0100
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 TEHO - phone display issue
Hi Brian/Rogers/All,

thanks for responses

I have tried all combinations of the following - all calls suceed in ringing 
4158884343 on the PSTN Line

RP  91415.8884343
called party transformation XXXXXXXXXX  as per IPX PG.
dig manipulation on the RL - > call suceeds/ display still remains "TO 
914158884343"

RP 9.14158884343
Predot (on the RP) (as per Brian's suggestion)
dig manipulation on the RL - > call suceeds/ display still remains "TO 
914158884343"

RP 91.4158884343
Predot (on the RP)
XXXXXXXXXX called party transform mask on the RP
dig manipulation on the RL - > call suceeds/ display still remains "TO 
914158884343"

This is using Ver 7 CUCM.  I have tried using

a 7961 FW 9-1-1SR1S
a 7965 FW 8-4-1S

I then tried to connect to my work's Lab CUCM - running v8.5 using IP 
Communicator and get exactly the same results.

Think i'm going mad or missing something really obvious.  Dig Manipulations 
works fine, just cannot get the display to change from 914158884343 to 
4158884343 when i am trying to manipulate on Route Pattern Level as advised.  
Any suggestions would be appreciated,

Many thanks

Stuart
________________________________
From: Brian Mulgrew [btmulg...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 6:24 PM
To: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 TEHO - phone display issue
 Hi
set rp as 9.14158884343
set cld party xfm on rp as pre. (for TO display)
and set relevant cld party xfm on gwys / rout list for dnis digit manipulation

hth

________________________________
From: stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:43:46 +0100
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 TEHO - phone display issue
Hi All,

I am working through Vol2 Lab TEHO requirement where we are asked to dial 
914158884343 from HQ Phone via the BR1 gateway (H323) as first choice as a 
local call. and then the HQ MGCP Gateway as second choice as National call 1 + 
10 digits.

I have no issue with the routing of the calls and digit manipulation, however 
the question requests

"the caller should see TO 4158884343 regardless of whether the call is sent out 
of Br1 & HQ.

I have read the PG and OSL Archives.

I have tried using called party transformations XXXXXXXXXX on the Route Pattern 
level & also the RG level.  I am definitely sending 4158884343 to both 
gateways, however I my display always states "TO 914158884343".

Previous OSL archives suggest adding the following to the H323 GW

voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update

I have tried this but this has not changed anything - and also I still have the 
same issue via my MGCP gateway.

I have even tried a TP of 914158884343, called party mask of 4158884343, which 
then matches a RP of 4158884343 - which again routes correctly but the display 
does not change.

Has anyone else encountered this before?

kind regards

Stuart

The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is confidential. It 
must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, relied upon or used by 
any person other than the intended recipient. Unauthorised use, disclosure or 
copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error 
immediately contact the sender and postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk then permanently 
delete it and any attachments. NG Bailey may monitor email where it is 
considered proportionate to any perceived risk. This email has been sent on 
behalf of an NG Bailey company, if in doubt ask the sender to clarify which 
company.  The NG Bailey companies include NG Bailey Limited (342778), NG Bailey 
IT Services Limited (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities Services Limited (5472032), 
Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145) and NG Bailey Group Limited 
(1490238).  All of the companies, except Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited, 
are registered in England with registered office at Denton Hall Ilkley West 
Yorkshire LS29 0HH.  Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited is registered in 
Northern Ireland and its registered office is c/o Carson McDowell, Murray 
House, Murray Street, Belfast, BT1 6DN.
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding 
industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a 
CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to