Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE
Collaboration - Sign the Petition!

Please join this campaign: http://chn.ge/17A0zXE



On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:01 PM, probert...@gmail.com
<probert...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Watching this video is ironic:
> Ben Ng at Cisco Live 2012: http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/23271405
>
> But you can hear where the idea for the new name came from.
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Brian Schear 
> <brian.sch...@vitalsite.com>wrote:
>
>> It is Ben Ng.  Found his linked in profile below which describes his
>> position in Cisco.
>>
>> www.linkedin.com/pub/ben-ng/3/509/940
>>
>> Profile on the Cisco site.
>>
>> https://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le31/communities/netpro/bios/benng.html
>>
>> Anyone have better contact info to send him respectful and thoughtful
>> arguments on this?
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:11 AM
>> To: Leslie Meade
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; vma...@ipexpert.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
>>
>> Ben Ng comes to mind
>>
>> On May 29, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Leslie Meade <leslie.me...@lvs1.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The question is... what if anything can we do ?
>> > Where would we start..
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -------- Original message --------
>> > From: Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com>
>> > Date:
>> > To: Bill Lake <whl...@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>,Vik Malhi
>> > <vma...@ipexpert.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially
>> > announced
>> >
>> >
>> > Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to
>> remain CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is
>> Voice and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look
>> at it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the
>> name of the new CCIE really should be anyway.  The core of the Voice
>> blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a
>> refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing
>> another.
>> >
>> > In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start
>> over again with Collaboration.  There are too many similarities between the
>> two.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake <whl...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> whl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ranting about it won't change anything.  I read on line that when they
>> retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or
>> lab.  If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag.
>> >
>> > That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the
>> first from my reading.  Storage had this happen earlier this year as have
>> several others.  See here with the snippet.  Now the second is a wiki so we
>> would want official confirmation.
>> >
>> > https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_
>> > tracks
>> > Retired CCIE tracks
>> >
>> > Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by
>> Cisco. These are:
>> >
>> >  *   WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the
>> IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the StrataCom<
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom> acquisition)
>> >  *   ISP Dial CCIE
>> >  *   SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue)
>> >  *   Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely
>> different design tests in format and subjects examined)
>> >
>> > People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs,
>> provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the
>> title "CCIE", rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization.
>> >
>> > So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of
>> CCIE if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have
>> already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that
>> have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george <m.george00...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:m.george00...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Vik,
>> >
>> > A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice
>> is still the toughest one & i know some double IE's who couldn't pass
>> Voice. If Cisco has lost faith in re-cert, that should apply to every
>> track, not just Voice.
>> >
>> > Naturally, they should have renamed Certification to
>> Voice/Collaboration or Voice/Video etc & introduced new version. If they
>> had to do this retiring thing, why didn't they do when they introduced V3
>> from V2 ? Old days of Call Manager based on Windows & literally everything
>> based on windows, Analog endpoints/VGs/ATAs etc. Retiring CCIE Voice makes
>> no sense whatsoever whether be it from marketing point of view or any
>> other.  Why can't big buck makers at Cisco just rename a Cert rather than
>> do something completely rubbish.
>> >
>> > With just one announcement, they have made many people lose faith in
>> Certification process. I am sure Voice labs will be the most deserted labs
>> until Feb 2014.
>> >
>> > At the end of day, we can only request Cisco to "re-consider" this
>> decision. I hope folks concerned "collaborate" &  put their suggestions
>> forward on Cisco Support Community & direct to Cisco Certification teams so
>> they "realize" what they are doing is NOT right.
>> >
>> > I will take some months for us to digest this news.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Vik Malhi <vma...@ipexpert.com
>> <mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:
>> > As I said before - I would think product marketing had something to say
>> about this. Just my opinion. Why for the last 4 years has there been a lack
>> of Microsoft products in the exam? Are Microsoft are not relevant or it
>> Marketing bullying the content team?
>> >
>> > At the same time there are many folks out there with a voice IE who
>> can't spell SIP. So what do you do about those folks?
>> >
>> > Historically Cisco have trusted their recertification process as a
>> valid check and balance.
>> >
>> > It looks like they have lost a bit of faith in the written exams as a
>> valid means to recertification- and that is no surprise to any of us as we
>> all know a 2nd grader could pass one of those exams (and I don't condone
>> the means through which that is possible).
>> >
>> > When the dust has settled I will be advising all existing voice IE's
>> two things: look at this as an extra challenge that will reap extra reward
>> and secondly - diversify. Collaboration expertise in the very literal sense
>> cannot be confined to a monolithic single vendor application time test that
>> is going to occur . I would have thought a true collaboration expert would
>> (if not now, never) be encouraged to seek skills and experience from a
>> wider spectrum of vendors.
>> >
>> > Rant over.
>> >
>> > On May 28, 2013, at 20:14, Hesham Abdelkereem <heshamcentr...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:heshamcentr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes its really frustrating what Cisco is doing to us.
>> > Ok let me tell you this.
>> > People now have invested a lot of money in pursuing their CCIE Voice
>> > that includes (Verious Workbook fees , Rack Rentals , Home Lab building
>> , travel expenses and Lab fees attempts for whatever times) So when people
>> achieve CCIE Voice nowadays a year or two later it would be considered old
>> and grandfathered.
>> > Also , Cisco has released a new lab for 2 months while they are
>> planning to abolish the whole syllabus.
>> > Why they do that to us???? They already make money out of everything
>> especially lab multiple times of lab attempts per each person.
>> >
>> > CCIE Voice achievers has to send cisco request for Migration without
>> Lab test.
>> > CCVP it was automatically migrated to CCNP Voice without any additional
>> tests.
>> > CCNA is migrated to CCNA R/S without any additional tests.
>> > In case of Video part then I suggest whether they force CCIE Voice
>> people to make CCNA VIDEO or CCNP Video if they will release or they make
>> just a migration lab track that includes VIDEO stuff only for a cheaper fee
>> something like $500.
>> >
>> > Thats same for MICROSOFT they abolished MCSE to change it to MCITP
>> people usually just add 2 tracks to become full MCITP same when they
>> migrate to new MCSE (Microsoft Certified Solutions Experts) there is only
>> an upgrade track rather than taking the whole 5 tracks again.
>> >
>> >
>> > Cisco obviously has to do something like that.It's really unfair
>> retiring the whole cisco voice totally.
>> > Guys to make the new Collaboration lab that would cost anyone over 50K
>> to buy telepresence , X9XX routers stuff , 9971 Video Phones , TV's and
>> etc..
>> > Even the rack rentals would be 5 times the old voice track as the
>> equipment would be way more expensive.
>> >
>> > Seriously , We have to agree all of us from multiple different voice
>> > study group to have a migration track to Collaboration please share
>> > your thoughts guys [X]
>> >
>> >
>> > On 28 May 2013 18:56, Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com<mailto:
>> m...@markholloway.com>> wrote:
>> > Bummer, I was really hoping CCIE Voice candidates would transition to
>> Collaboration without any additional lab exams.
>> >
>> > On May 28, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Vik Malhi <vma...@ipexpert.com<mailto:
>> vma...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> For my initial reaction read here:
>> >>
>> >> http://bit.ly/12MNK5t
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
>> >> Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.
>> >>
>> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420<tel:%2B1.810.326.1444%20ext%20420>
>> >> Fax: +1.810.454.0130<tel:%2B1.810.454.0130>
>> >> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com<mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >>
>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the
>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
>> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>> Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or destroy all copies
>> and the original document.
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to