It is not more than CCIE voice v3.5 it is not v.4 even

Sent from my iPhone

On May 31, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Ken Wyan <kew...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  There's a serious fault with this new announcement.
>  
> We can't say this new blueprint as CCIE Collaboration & it should be CCIE 
> Voice version 4. CCIE Voice track should be allowed to continue with this new 
> v4 blueprint.
>  
> If Cisco want to add another CCIE Collaboration Track they have to add 
> additional products such as  WebEx Server , VCS , Telepresence MSE , 
> Telepresence Multipoint Switch , Telepresence Server , Telepresence Manager , 
> TMS & suitable endpoints.
>  
> Then current CCIE Voice guys will be more than happy to complete their 
> Collaboration certification & become dual CCIEs. It will be definitely a 
> career advancement path for them.
>  
> If Cisco can call this new blueprint as "CCIE Collaboration"  ; why can't 
> they call all current voice CCIE's as Collaboration CCIEs.?
>  
> Ken
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Mohammed Al-Assadi <m_alass...@hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Ben e-mail
>> 
>> be...@cisco.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > From: brian.sch...@vitalsite.com
>> > To: rrcr...@yahoo.com; leslie.me...@lvs1.com
>> > Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:29:14 +0000
>> > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> 
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
>> > 
>> > It is Ben Ng. Found his linked in profile below which describes his 
>> > position in Cisco.
>> > 
>> > www.linkedin.com/pub/ben-ng/3/509/940
>> > 
>> > Profile on the Cisco site.
>> > 
>> > https://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le31/communities/netpro/bios/benng.html
>> > 
>> > Anyone have better contact info to send him respectful and thoughtful 
>> > arguments on this?
>> > 
>> > Brian
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:11 AM
>> > To: Leslie Meade
>> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; vma...@ipexpert.com
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
>> > 
>> > Ben Ng comes to mind
>> > 
>> > On May 29, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Leslie Meade <leslie.me...@lvs1.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> > > The question is... what if anything can we do ?
>> > > Where would we start..
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -------- Original message --------
>> > > From: Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com>
>> > > Date:
>> > > To: Bill Lake <whl...@gmail.com>
>> > > Cc: OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>,Vik Malhi
>> > > <vma...@ipexpert.com>
>> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially
>> > > announced
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to remain 
>> > > CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is Voice 
>> > > and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look at 
>> > > it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the 
>> > > name of the new CCIE really should be anyway. The core of the Voice 
>> > > blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a 
>> > > refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing 
>> > > another.
>> > >
>> > > In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start 
>> > > over again with Collaboration. There are too many similarities between 
>> > > the two.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake 
>> > > <whl...@gmail.com<mailto:whl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Ranting about it won't change anything. I read on line that when they 
>> > > retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or 
>> > > lab. If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag.
>> > >
>> > > That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the 
>> > > first from my reading. Storage had this happen earlier this year as have 
>> > > several others. See here with the snippet. Now the second is a wiki so 
>> > > we would want official confirmation.
>> > >
>> > > https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226
>> > >
>> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_
>> > > tracks
>> > > Retired CCIE tracks
>> > >
>> > > Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by Cisco. 
>> > > These are:
>> > >
>> > > * WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the 
>> > > IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the 
>> > > StrataCom<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom> acquisition)
>> > > * ISP Dial CCIE
>> > > * SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue)
>> > > * Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely different 
>> > > design tests in format and subjects examined)
>> > >
>> > > People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs, 
>> > > provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the 
>> > > title "CCIE", rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization.
>> > >
>> > > So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of CCIE 
>> > > if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have 
>> > > already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that 
>> > > have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal.
>> > >
>> > > Bill
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george 
>> > > <m.george00...@gmail.com<mailto:m.george00...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > Vik,
>> > >
>> > > A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice is 
>> > > still the toughest one & i know some double IE's who couldn't pass 
>> > > Voice. If Cisco has lost faith in re-cert, that should apply to every 
>> > > track, not just Voice.
>> > >
>> > > Naturally, they should have renamed Certification to Voice/Collaboration 
>> > > or Voice/Video etc & introduced new version. If they had to do this 
>> > > retiring thing, why didn't they do when they introduced V3 from V2 ? Old 
>> > > days of Call Manager based on Windows & literally everything based on 
>> > > windows, Analog endpoints/VGs/ATAs etc. Retiring CCIE Voice makes no 
>> > > sense whatsoever whether be it from marketing point of view or any 
>> > > other. Why can't big buck makers at Cisco just rename a Cert rather than 
>> > > do something completely rubbish.
>> > >
>> > > With just one announcement, they have made many people lose faith in 
>> > > Certification process. I am sure Voice labs will be the most deserted 
>> > > labs until Feb 2014.
>> > >
>> > > At the end of day, we can only request Cisco to "re-consider" this 
>> > > decision. I hope folks concerned "collaborate" & put their suggestions 
>> > > forward on Cisco Support Community & direct to Cisco Certification teams 
>> > > so they "realize" what they are doing is NOT right.
>> > >
>> > > I will take some months for us to digest this news.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Vik Malhi 
>> > > <vma...@ipexpert.com<mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:
>> > > As I said before - I would think product marketing had something to say 
>> > > about this. Just my opinion. Why for the last 4 years has there been a 
>> > > lack of Microsoft products in the exam? Are Microsoft are not relevant 
>> > > or it Marketing bullying the content team?
>> > >
>> > > At the same time there are many folks out there with a voice IE who 
>> > > can't spell SIP. So what do you do about those folks?
>> > >
>> > > Historically Cisco have trusted their recertification process as a valid 
>> > > check and balance.
>> > >
>> > > It looks like they have lost a bit of faith in the written exams as a 
>> > > valid means to recertification- and that is no surprise to any of us as 
>> > > we all know a 2nd grader could pass one of those exams (and I don't 
>> > > condone the means through which that is possible).
>> > >
>> > > When the dust has settled I will be advising all existing voice IE's two 
>> > > things: look at this as an extra challenge that will reap extra reward 
>> > > and secondly - diversify. Collaboration expertise in the very literal 
>> > > sense cannot be confined to a monolithic single vendor application time 
>> > > test that is going to occur . I would have thought a true collaboration 
>> > > expert would (if not now, never) be encouraged to seek skills and 
>> > > experience from a wider spectrum of vendors.
>> > >
>> > > Rant over.
>> > >
>> > > On May 28, 2013, at 20:14, Hesham Abdelkereem 
>> > > <heshamcentr...@gmail.com<mailto:heshamcentr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Yes its really frustrating what Cisco is doing to us.
>> > > Ok let me tell you this.
>> > > People now have invested a lot of money in pursuing their CCIE Voice
>> > > that includes (Verious Workbook fees , Rack Rentals , Home Lab building 
>> > > , travel expenses and Lab fees attempts for whatever times) So when 
>> > > people achieve CCIE Voice nowadays a year or two later it would be 
>> > > considered old and grandfathered.
>> > > Also , Cisco has released a new lab for 2 months while they are planning 
>> > > to abolish the whole syllabus.
>> > > Why they do that to us???? They already make money out of everything 
>> > > especially lab multiple times of lab attempts per each person.
>> > >
>> > > CCIE Voice achievers has to send cisco request for Migration without Lab 
>> > > test.
>> > > CCVP it was automatically migrated to CCNP Voice without any additional 
>> > > tests.
>> > > CCNA is migrated to CCNA R/S without any additional tests.
>> > > In case of Video part then I suggest whether they force CCIE Voice 
>> > > people to make CCNA VIDEO or CCNP Video if they will release or they 
>> > > make just a migration lab track that includes VIDEO stuff only for a 
>> > > cheaper fee something like $500.
>> > >
>> > > Thats same for MICROSOFT they abolished MCSE to change it to MCITP 
>> > > people usually just add 2 tracks to become full MCITP same when they 
>> > > migrate to new MCSE (Microsoft Certified Solutions Experts) there is 
>> > > only an upgrade track rather than taking the whole 5 tracks again.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Cisco obviously has to do something like that.It's really unfair 
>> > > retiring the whole cisco voice totally.
>> > > Guys to make the new Collaboration lab that would cost anyone over 50K 
>> > > to buy telepresence , X9XX routers stuff , 9971 Video Phones , TV's and 
>> > > etc..
>> > > Even the rack rentals would be 5 times the old voice track as the 
>> > > equipment would be way more expensive.
>> > >
>> > > Seriously , We have to agree all of us from multiple different voice
>> > > study group to have a migration track to Collaboration please share
>> > > your thoughts guys [X]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 28 May 2013 18:56, Mark Holloway 
>> > > <m...@markholloway.com<mailto:m...@markholloway.com>> wrote:
>> > > Bummer, I was really hoping CCIE Voice candidates would transition to 
>> > > Collaboration without any additional lab exams.
>> > >
>> > > On May 28, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Vik Malhi 
>> > > <vma...@ipexpert.com<mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> For my initial reaction read here:
>> > >>
>> > >> http://bit.ly/12MNK5t
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
>> > >> Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.
>> > >>
>> > >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420<tel:%2B1.810.326.1444%20ext%20420>
>> > >> Fax: +1.810.454.0130<tel:%2B1.810.454.0130>
>> > >> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com<mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > >> please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> > >>
>> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> > >
>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> > >
>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> > >
>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>
>> > >
>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> > >
>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> > 
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> > 
>> > ________________________________
>> > 
>> > This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the 
>> > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain 
>> > information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
>> > under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
>> > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
>> > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
>> > notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or destroy all 
>> > copies and the original document.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> > 
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to