it is still very bad, but at least it would mean there was some
experimental
evidence for the model and it was not completely made up.
Mark
Mark J. van Raaij
Unidad de Bioquímica Estructural
Dpto de Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia
and
Unidad de Rayos X, Edificio CACTUS
Universidad de Santiago
15782 Santiago de Compostela
Spain
http://web.usc.es/~vanraaij/
On 17 Aug 2007, at 17:53, Manfred S. Weiss wrote:
how about this scenario:
the structure really is as published, or very like it, but upon
refinement, R-factors were high, other indicators were dodgy etc. so
the authors were afraid to publish as is and made up a dataset to
support their structure - this would be a bit less bad.
pardon me. you can't seriously mean what you just wrote. maybe
somebody ought to be checking your structures ...
;-) Manfred.
********************************************************************
* *
* Dr. Manfred S. Weiss *
* *
* Team Leader *
* *
* EMBL Hamburg Outstation Fon: +49-40-89902-170 *
* c/o DESY, Notkestr. 85 Fax: +49-40-89902-149 *
* D-22603 Hamburg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* GERMANY Web: www.embl-hamburg.de/~msweiss/ *
* *
********************************************************************
