On Monday 12 January 2009 02:42:43 Ian Tickle wrote: > Also I did a 'Google vote' for the two terms. 'Structure amplitude' has > 11300 hits. 'Structure factor amplitude' has only 4750. So all round I > would say that 'structure amplitude' wins by a considerable margin.
The field of crystagooglography is relatively young, and standard procedures have not yet been established :-) Here's what I get: +"structure factor amplitude" 18,000 hits +"structure amplitude" 17,100 hits Ethan > > Cheers > > -- Ian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk > > [mailto:owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pavel Afonine > > Sent: 11 January 2009 03:01 > > To: Ethan A Merritt > > Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk > > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] structure (factor) amplitude > > > > > > > > On 1/10/2009 5:14 PM, Ethan A Merritt wrote: > > > > On Saturday 10 January 2009, Bernhard Rupp wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > I am getting conflicting comments on the use of > > 'structure factor amplitude' > > vs. just > > 'structure amplitude' > > for |F|. > > > > > > > > ??? > > That's just... odd. > > > > |F| is the amplitude of F. > > But no way F is a "structure". > > > > > > > > I agree. If F is a structure factor then |F| is a structure > > factor amplitude. "structure amplitude" doesn't make much sense... > > Pavel. > > > Disclaimer > This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information > intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed > except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the > intended recipient you must not review, use, disclose, copy, distribute or > take any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this communication > in error, please notify Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing > i.tic...@astex-therapeutics.com and destroy all copies of the message and any > attached documents. > Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its messaging > traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy. The Company accepts no > liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and > attachments having left the Astex Therapeutics domain. Unless expressly > stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not > of Astex Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any > attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex Therapeutics Ltd > accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted by this > email. E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized > amendment, and tampering, Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive > e-mails on the basis that the Company is not liable for any such alteration > or any consequences thereof. > Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge Science Park, > Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674 > -- Ethan A Merritt Biomolecular Structure Center University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742