Every dataset costs money to produce. Is it more cost effective to expect that those wishing to use the data repeat the expenditures by repeating the experiments? To exaggerate the point, imagine a world without published research articles, would it be more expensive to do science or less? We should not simply dismiss an idea just because we think today that "640K is more memory than anyone will ever need"
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 3:47 PM, Adrian Goldman wrote: > 2) I agree with Susan. In a time of limited funding, is this the most > important use of money?
