Don't you mean Acta Antivitrifica?

James

On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Boaz Shaanan wrote:

> And then change the name of the journals to Acta Anticrystallographica A-E
> 
>         Boaz
>  
>  
> Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.                                         
> Dept. of Life Sciences                                      
> Ben-Gurion University of the Negev                          
> Beer-Sheva 84105                                            
> Israel                                                      
>                                                             
> E-mail: bshaa...@bgu.ac.il
> Phone: 972-8-647-2220  Skype: boaz.shaanan                  
> Fax:   972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710    
>  
>  
>                  
> 
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of George 
> Sheldrick [gshe...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:35 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] vitrification vs freezing
> 
> As usual, Wikipedia has it right: "The antifreeze capabilities of ethylene 
> glycol have made it an important component of vitrification 
> (anticrystallization) mixtures .." 
> 
> Perhaps we should call it anticrystallization?
> 
> George
> 
> On 11/15/2012 09:15 PM, James Stroud wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Tim Gruene wrote:
>>> I have heard this discussion before and reminds me of people claiming
>>> strawberries were nuts - which botanically may be correct, but would
>>> still not make me complain about strawberries in a fruit cake I
>>> ordered at a restaurant.
>>> 
>>> My Pengiun English Dictionary states (amongst other explanations)
>>> freeze: "to make extremely cold",
>> Tim's comment strikes at the heart of the problem.
>> 
>> I think the scientific community should decide a few points.
>> 
>> 1. What is the approved language and dialect for science?
>> 2. Within this dialect, what should be the authoritative dictionary?
>> 3. Will we allow use of definitions that are not the primary definition 
>> (second, third, fourth).
>> 4. Will we allow the use of homonyms?
>> 5. If not, which homonyms should prevail?
>> 
>> These are all very important questions if we completely disregard context in 
>> writing.
>> 
>> James
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
> Dept. Structural Chemistry, 
> University of Goettingen,
> Tammannstr. 4,
> D37077 Goettingen, Germany
> Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
> Fax. +49-551-39-22582
> 
> 

Reply via email to