Joerg Schilling wrote: > > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 19:11:43 2001 > > >> In this special case it is particulary bad because the hack does not > >> add new things to cdrecord but is a different implementation for a feature > >> that is available from me for 3.5 years. If you don't make it clear, that this > >> is _not_ the official cdrecord-ProDVD I am forced to change the license > >> so that it is no more 100% GPL :-( > > >As far as I can see from test version of proDVD, it does not support > >incremental and multisession recording. My patch, in its second version > > So far nobody did request this feature. > > >does. So it brings something new, technically speaking. > >Even without that, it brings something __really__ new: the possibility > >to > >freely (as in speech) write DVDs on Linux (and possibly other Unixes). > > Interesting statement ;-) If you believe that cdrecord needs help from > outside, please tell me why up to now nobody helped me with general > work? Probably because you did a really good job and nobody was really unhappy with cdrecord to start modifing it.
> Additional question: Do you realize, that more than 90% of the code modifications > needed to make cdrecord work with DVD writers are already public for a long > time? How long do you believe you would have to work on cdrecord if there > was no code for DVD support inside the public part of cdrecord. > Of course I realize. The MMC stuff inside is actualy the base I used to implement the few differences between CD and DVD writing. Please understandt that I don't want to take your merits for cdrecord. mache -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
