> Ok, fair enough. I guess that I can understand that line
> of thinking from
> them (the NRA) in that their concern is that if there is
> any limiting
> legislation, it could become a slippery slope. I still
> don't see the need
> for these weapons to be readily available, either for
> hunting (LOL) or home
> defense, but oh well...
I find that a good M-16 is much more effective when hunting deer. With
only a rifle the deer can run for 100 yards or so after its been shot,
whereas the assault weapon puts it on the ground immediately. Saves me
some walking. Not to mention if you like puree'd fowl, it's pretty
effective.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Sam Morris
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question John Stanley
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Marwan Saidi
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question G
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Marwan Saidi
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Monique Boea
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Doug White
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jim Campbell
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Matthew Small
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jim Campbell