It's important to know though that a fully automatic M-16 would still
be illegal even if there is no assault weapons ban.
Assault weapon != machine gun.
-Kevin
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:37:18 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find that a good M-16 is much more effective when hunting deer. With
> only a rifle the deer can run for 100 yards or so after its been shot,
> whereas the assault weapon puts it on the ground immediately. Saves me
> some walking. Not to mention if you like puree'd fowl, it's pretty
> effective.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Sam Morris
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question John Stanley
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Marwan Saidi
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question G
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Marwan Saidi
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Monique Boea
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Doug White
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jim Campbell
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Matthew Small
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jim Campbell
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question G
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons