giraffes, won't this hurt family values, why shouldn't I be able to
get married at thirteen, oops I never said that why are you putting
words in my mouth, must be a girl thing, I am offended by your
references to the 40's, I am a product of affirmative action and proud
of it kind of stuff I have been going through lately :)
I'll get over it. It's a beautiful day and I am going out there into
the sunshine. How was the Bourne Conspiracy?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:00:49 -0500
Subject: RE: Interesting Quote
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Damn. Must we be honest? Can't we just argue the opposite position?
(Actually, I am a bleeding heart tree-hugging vegan)
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Interesting Quote
I see nothing wrong with an honest debate, personally. Emphasis on honest.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:00:19 -0500
Subject: RE: Interesting Quote
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<g> Well said.
Didn't say I was perfect! (I try not to state the obvious)
Many people dislike arguing, believing that "heated" is part of the
definition, and prefer to debate or discuss.
I, however, prefer arguing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:19 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Interesting Quote
An argument, by definition is:
"the act or process of arguing. a coherent series of statements leading
from
a premise to a conclusion"
In that light, what I said it true. I said nothing about the exchange of
invectives but rather referred to the above meaning of "argument."
To paraphrase:
Another way to respond to my email would have been to express a lack of
understanding and ask for context or even just to express your view rather
than assuming that I was referring to some kind of heated argument.
Howie
P.S. it's "Jane, you ignorant 'slut'"
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: Interesting Quote
Howie,
Perhaps they are referring to the fact that many arguments do not entail
an
exchange of ideas, but rather an exchange of invectives.
For example, another way to respond to Monique's email would have been to
express a lack of understanding and ask for context or even just to
express
your view rather than adding "That quote makes no sense". This is one of
the
civilities that is missing from many dialogues today. We revert
immediately
to "Jane, you ignorant slot".
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:57 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Interesting Quote
That quote makes no sense. Arguments serve a purpose and are many times
intellectual and thought-provoking.
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:51 AM
Subject: Interesting Quote
"It is only the intellectually lost who ever
argue"________________________________________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
