On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:24:18 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hindsight. Everyone thought that he had them back then.
Please stop saying that. I didn't think he had them, and that was
based on information from multiple weapon's inspectors. Sam likes to
trot out comments from Blix but conveniently doesn't include the later
statements that Blix felt he was perhaps wrong. Statements prior to
invasion. Same with Russia. And though I don't have the links now,
Israeli intelligence also said they had been closely watching what was
going in and out and didn't see any evidence of WMD. (Of course, they
had political reasons to want us to invade.)
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: The politicization of the ... Kevin Graeme
- Re: The politicization of the ... dana tierney
- RE: The politicization of the ... Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The politicization of the ... dana tierney
- RE: The politicization of the ... Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The politicization of the ... dana tierney
- RE: The politicization of the ... Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The politicization of the ... dana tierney
- Re: The politicization of the ... Jochem van Dieten
- Re: The politicization of the ... dana tierney
- Re: The politicization of the ... Kevin Graeme
- Re: The politicization of the ... Sam Morris
- Re: The politicization of the ... dana tierney
- Re: The politicization of the ... Kevin Graeme
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Sam Morris
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Larry C. Lyons
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Gruss Gott
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Jochem van Dieten
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Gruss Gott
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Judith Dinowitz
- Re: The politicization of the Iraq War Sam Morris