ok so nobody on the right has studied the issue because by definition if you think there is an issue you are not on the right? Is that what you are saying?
And no, darlin, it isn't obvious. Not to me. Explain it to me. Dana On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:56:27 -0800 (PST), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone politically correct supported that > nonsense? > They are studies meant to attacking the right. They > are funded by the left to make the right look bad. > It's pretty obvious if you read their polls. > > > > > --- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You're saying someone called you ignorant in another > > thread? Who was that? > > > > And yeah, I try to operate in reality. At times it > > seems to me that > > you refuse to do so. For instance, your rejection of > > the pipa data. > > Does it not occur to you that some people have a > > disinterested > > interest in truth, regardless of politics? Or > > funding? If these > > particular people aren't, then ok... but I see no > > data to suggest > > that. Has anyone you would consider politically > > correct even addressed > > this issue? > > > > Dana > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. > www.yahoo.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134143 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
