These studies pretty recent Larry?

Also, how would you get away with submitting identical resumes to the same 
position? Wonder if that would raise a red flag to the person reviewing the 
resumes. Two guys with the same exact everything...

Still, these results are pretty disappointing.


> Mosty race,
>
> there's been a number of studies where researchers have sent in
> identical resumes to job postings, one resume the resume uses typical
> white names (ie., John Smith) while the other used black names
> (Tyrone, Kwaze etc). The so-called white resumes were much more likely
> to receive callbacks than the resumes that used typical black names.
> Remember these resumes were identical only the names were different.
>
> larry
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:01:26 -0500, Jerry Johnson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We were not trying to answer the question of "what race is more likely to 
>> be poor in America". (If we answered that, it would overwhelmingly be 
>> Native American.)
>>
>> The question was, is it race and only race that is truly the major 
>> discrimination factor in workplace and college admissions. Or is it 
>> poverty. Or social/ethnic differences. Or religion. Or immigration 
>> status. Or gender. Or a combination of the above.
>>
>> By noting that there are more whites in poverty than anyone else, we have 
>> a good population to test to see if race is the deciding factor. Do these 
>> whites have the same kind of admissions and hiring numbers as any other 
>> person from the same economic level? Do all of these whites of the same 
>> poverty level have the same admissions and hiring numbers? If not, what 
>> are the differences? Are they based on area of the country? Family 
>> makeup? Family history below the poverty line? School district? Speech 
>> patterns and dialect?
>>
>> And, of course, percentages don't always tell the whole story. My friend 
>> the moa is very poor. Since he is the only one left, that would mean that 
>> the moa has the highest percentage of poverty by population - 100%. 
>> (Which he brings up whenever we order the first round of drinks after the 
>> flightless bird toss olympics).
>>
>>
>> Jerry Johnson
>> Web Developer
>> Dolan Media Company
>>
>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/28/05 10:48AM >>>
>> How could you even attempt to interpret this by Absolute numbers when 
>> you're dealing with different population figures?
>> And I'm assuming you mean poor whites in America, since as we all know 
>> Whites are a minority when taken as a race worldwide.
>>
>> It's like saying if you have 100 Red mice that have a problem out of 
>> 1000, and 5 blue mice that have a problem out of 10, that the
>> problem is more prevalent in Red Mice than Blue Mice because you have 100 
>> Red mice with the problem as opposed to 5 blue mice.
>> Which is the wrong way to interpret it if you are trying to determine 
>> which mouse population is more affected by the problem.
>> Clearly the Blue mouse population where 50% of the population has the 
>> problem is more affected than the Red mouse population where
>> only 10% of the population is affected.
>>
>> Logic dictates that the same applies when dealing with this topic with 
>> regards to **Minorities** and Non Minorities when answering
>> the question which population is affected more by poverty or has a higher 
>> poverty level in the US.
>>
>> You have to deal with percentages when answering the question "What race 
>> is more likely to be poor in America? Whites or Non
>> Whites".
>> It is completely wrong to say 'Whites because there are more of them' in 
>> answer to that question.
>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:145118
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to