We weren't talking about the actions of two consenting adults. (Which argument all by itself works fine for me, as long as I don't have to watch) We were talking about forbidding actions that are "natural" to a minority segment of the population due to uncontrollable physiolocial differences.
The conservatism (and the follow on .net line) was a joke. On 7/6/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I think in all of those cases we are no longer talking about the > actions of two consenting adults. In each of those cases (except > conservatism, not sure how that even fits), someone is getting hurt in > some way, be it psychologically, monetarily, etc. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163289 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
