I miss your analogy. But to use is, Israel didn't build a temple on Muslim land, quite the opposite. Before there was Islam, the Temple was there. Jews were there. Islam built their shrine on top of the Temple remains and guess what, the Israeli government and the Jews of the world didn't tear it down. Israel respects the religious sites and rights of others. Sometimes too much. Jews are prohibited from praying on the Temple mound for fear of upsetting Muslims. There's no fear of Muslim prayer offending Jews (or Christians for that matter).
> not to mention, that if i were a buddhist, and i took land from a > muslim, i wouldnt need the mosque any longer, i would build a temple? > > right? > > like, if i dont have my feet any longer, i wouldnt need my shoes. > > tw > > On 9/13/05, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> isnt a temple just a building, when there are no longer any worshipers in >> it? >> i do belive in the sanctetity of a building, but with out the >> congregation >> to inhabit the structure, it is as lifeless as a stone... >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:173979 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
