What I understand is that if Wal-Mart had to provide health care for the
thousand or so employees at my store, either the store wouldn't have
existed, or there would have been far fewer employees.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:30 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Wal-Mart
> 
> exactly so you over looked the lack of health care benifits 
> and possibly other things that a company SHOULD provide. You 
> are willing to make sacrafices I understand that anything is 
> better than nothing, but a company should nto take adavtage of this.
> 
> Adam
> 
> On 1/13/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > No. It means they are an employer.
> >
> > I already mentioned I worked there for years man.  Does it suck?  
> > Yeah.  I was a young married guy, no education, GED, 
> nothing to offer a company.
> > They let me have food on my table, and I was happy as shit 
> to have it.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:14 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> > >
> > > I think where I see a problem is that sometimes people have NO 
> > > CHOICE but to work there. A crappy job is still a job it atleast 
> > > pays for some stuff. I mean  if you need money yopu need 
> money amd 
> > > jsut b/c walmart furnashies a job for me does that mean thier a 
> > > great employer???
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > On 1/13/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You just made my argument for me.  People CHOOSE to work there.
> > > > Knowing ahead of time that there is no medical care.  So why 
> > > > should the state or anyone else pay for their health care?
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:56 AM
> > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer 
> subsidizing Walmart
> > > > >
> > > > > maybe not, but I won't be paying for it. As everyone
> > > keeps saying,
> > > > > people choose to work there.
> > > > >
> > > > > >only to go on to an HMO that has greater restrictions.
> > > So are they
> > > > > >people going to be any better off?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >No probably not.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192306
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to