If you believe #2 you are blind, probably wilfully so and there is no point in further duscussion. As to your union guy, what is your point?
By the way, that may be *your* definition of conservative. It is not mine, nor, apparently, this economics professor's. Conservative does not have to equal blindly agreeing to every sociopathic measure a corporation may take. Dana > > Dana wrote: > > What I can't understand is why people who think of themselves as > conservatives are in favor of > > LOL - you do realize there were no conservative points in any of that > article, right? Not a one. > > In any event the conservative bottom line is this: > > 1.) Gov't's ONLY reason to be involved in business is in the case of > a > massive market failure or rampant malfeasance. > > 2.) Wal-mart has does not exhibit any part of #1. > > As to social responsibility, that's purely a competitive advantage in > you're aiming at liberal customers. But even then it's usually not > because most liberals talk big but buy cheap. A family friend was a > huge union guy and rallied against Wal-mart all of the time, but > guess > where he shopped? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192647 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
