Yeah, I suspected you were thinking that was what we were saying. Which is why I said we're talking past each other.
"Our" side is saying that wal-mart is actually playing and creating big government for their exclusive corporate benefit. See the emminent domain, tax subsidies, and road reconstruction points. Complaining about the health insurance as big government issue is like a raindrop in the pond compared to what the corporations are doing to create and foster big government. To recap your side's argument (from "our" perspective): 1) Big government is bad when it helps the individual. 2) Big government is good when it helps corporations profit and control government. On 1/17/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the real difference between the sides that I can see (please > correct me if I'm mis-stating it): > > (1.) You, Larry, and others feel that because a business is > successful, agents of the government should be able to force it to > help solve social problems. Further, you think that people who > voluntarily accept positions with the company need the government's > defense. > > (2.) T-Bone, Nick, and others want as little gov't as possible and > especially don't think those that have worked their ass off to get > what they have should be penalized for it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192701 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
