+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:00 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > That pretty much sums up most of what I think. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:32 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > > > > > Here's the real difference between the sides that I can see (please > > correct me if I'm mis-stating it): > > > > (1.) You, Larry, and others feel that because a business is > > successful, agents of the government should be able to force it to > > help solve social problems. Further, you think that people who > > voluntarily accept positions with the company need the government's > > defense. > > > > (2.) T-Bone, Nick, and others want as little gov't as possible and > > especially don't think those that have worked their ass off to get > > what they have should be penalized for it. > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192705 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
