No I didn't. I posted a article that discusses both sides.
On 11/2/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You say facts as if they're undisputed. > > So do you. > > Fact: Kerry received a bronze star > Fact: The citation says it was for bravery under fire > Dispute: Other people, some who were there, some not, say there was no > gunfire. > > But the _fact_ remains that the citation says what it says and was > approved by people in the chain of command. > > > http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/k/kerry-swiftboats.htm > > > > Funny how out of 19 people on his boat only one or two support him. > > The doctor's claims are disputed also. Is he telling the truth? Maybe, > maybe not. The _fact_ that his name does not appear on the record is, > oddly, not disputed, but _he_ says it was common for the doctor's name > not to appear in reports of this type... given the military's > tradition of writing everything down, I find it difficult to believe > that the doctor's claim is indeed true. To put it another way, all we > have is _his_ say so about being involved and the actual paper > documentation says something else. Guess which would hold up in court? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219337 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
