well I am just confused then . Please bear with me. When you say "Supporting the enemy of our enemy isn't terrorism, it isn't good practice, but it isn't terrorism." you are replying to Gruss' comment about US support for Iraq when it was fighting Iran (1980-1988), correct? So this was not supporting terrorism then, according to you, despite what he was, at that time (1988 for example), doing to the Kurds?
So when th US removes Iraq from a list of countries that support terrorism (http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/zforum/03/sp_world_battle022703.htm) around 1983 so that they could give him military assistance against Iraq and against the Kurds... what keeps this from being support of terrorism? the fact that it's the US? On 11/11/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, in fact I said it wasn't good tactics, i said it wasn't a good idea. > > When somebody supports terrorism, they support terrorism, when somebody is a > terrorist they are a terrorist. > > The Iran-Iraq war was a war, it wasn't terrorism, we were supporting a > country at war with another country. To suggest our support of Iraq during > their war was equal to us supporting terrorism is wrong. > > > ________________________________ > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sat 11/11/2006 3:55 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Dems git r done > > > > ok so when we support the enemies of our enemies, it's good tactics. > When our enemies support our enemies it's terrorism? > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220458 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5