What part of PERSONAL OBSERVATION of scientific data didn't you understand? I can not point to any apolitical scientific organizations that share my beliefs. and I don't care. You made unqualified statements that 95% of the scientific community around the world agrees that "greenhouse" gasses are the cause of climate change. I doubt that. There is no such monolythic viewpoint.
There are many organizations of scientists who put out that POLITICAL view, but do all of the members believe it? I can rely on the data I have seen. Most of which is under NDA because it is either private data I have been able to see or it is in use for a potential published article. I trust my training and my analytical ability. It is trusted by others, which is why I have been given access to the data. To rely on a political theory exclusively as science is to deny the scientific method. >I didn't admit they had a political agenda, and if I gave that impression I >apologize. > >I could go out and find you the next largest scientific organization, and >then the third largest, on and on, and each of them would support both >evolution and current theories of climate change....but I don't really have >the time or the desire. I'd invite you to, though, if you really think their >are large, credible scientific organizations that doubt evolution (nope) and >the leading theories on climate change (doubtful, but more likely). > >I'd like to see their arguments > >On 2/12/07, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227860 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
