My "vast majority" starts with the largest association of American scientists, and the organization that publishes "Science", the largest circulated general science journal in the world:
www.aaas.org They promote the teaching of evolution and generally concurr with the IPCC findings about global warming. That's an awful lot of smart people with the same political bent, when you combine the IPCC and the AAAS. However, I'm more than willing to consider the large organizations of leading scientists that you can provide whom dispute evolution as valid science and discount the affects of humans on global warming.....? On 2/12/07, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where is your documentation? Where is the proof of your > percentages? Document your "vast majority" and not pointing to any > political organization. Don't throw up stats without backing them up with > documentary eveidence. > > I admit the climate is changing. I discount "greenhouse" gasses as the > cause. I have seen too much scientific evidence suggesting another cause, > pole reversal. > > I personally know very few scientists who do not have a political > agenda. Most want to preserve thier sacred research dollars. That is why I > gave it up and became a developer instead. > > The few I know who are not political do feel that there is not proof for > or against "greenhouse" gasses. There is ample proof of climate change, but > not for the cause. > > I even know a few scientists who feel this planet is about to start > another ice age. Opinions are rife about this. Just because the Democratic > party and the UN supports one theory does not mean I give it any credence. > > >Politically minded scientists are definitely a problem....like...the 5% > of > >scientists who tell you that global warming is a myth.....or the 2% of > >scientists who tell you that evolution is a myth. > > > >Yep, I can't stand those "scientists", and am flabbergasted when people > >choose to listen to them, instead of with the vast majority of their > >bretheren. I can only conclude that they must share the same political > bias > >that drove their "scientist" friend so far off track. > > > >On 2/12/07, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I love it! I'm glad I'm not the only person who has seen the problem > with > >> political minded scientists. > >> > > > >-- > >She's a PhD in "I told you so" > >You've a knighthood in "I'm not listening" > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227838 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
