I am not offended. I just think that a) you're trolling b) you are full of it when it comes to being who you say you are and c) there is not an adequate definition on measurement of "intelligence" to support such a statement.
On 10/28/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > I'm saying that intelligence *as measured in say the Stanford-Binet* > > is at least partially cutural. > > > > "Intelligence" (whatever that is, but I would say capacity and speed > of learning) is 100% genetic and MAY correlate or be caused by other > genetic traits which could include skin color. > > So back to Dr. Watson's comment: we have no idea if native *Africans* > (white, black, red ...) are, on average, less intelligent than Asians. > Wouldn't surprise me a bit. But then it also wouldn't surprise me if > Africans were smarter than Europeans. > > This is mostly because I'm open and accepting to the idea that my > particular genetic grouping, whatever you'd like to define it as, is, > on average, dumber than most 4th graders. Once you accept that, > nothing offends you. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies around the world in government. Find out how and where now http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:245357 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
