> gg wrote: > You're confusing the fog of battle with I meant:
You're confusing the fog of a battle with the reasons for, and management of, going to war. And if you look at Iraq, we're not at war. This is so, because we're simply there right now to provide security for the Iraqi population. That's not war, that's security. Now you might argue that we're at war with AQ, but that's not a nationalist cause, it's an "asymmetrical" movement and thus impossible to have a "war" with. That is, you can fight the same enemy across many countries all of whom we are not at war with. As an example, AQ has been seriously injured by the US invasion and occupation of ... Afghanistan NOT IRAQ. However AQ is reconstituting it's command-and-control in Pakistan and is about 1 year away from the same level of command freedom they had in 2000. So, we need to hit Pakistan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264272 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
